Feeds:
Posts
Comments

(revised 11/04/12)

In memory of 9/11:

Carter Conlon is currently Senior Pastor of Times Square Church, which was founded by the late David Wilkerson. Below is a moving video/audio of Carter Conlon preaching, with scenes from 9/11. But the message is far more serious than 9/11  – it has to do with the eternal destiny of our souls.

There are several versions of this video; here is a version with captions:

Click here for the transcript of this moving video. I have copied and pasted the entire transcript here. (I have emphasized certain points by bolding. Also, I have slightly revised the transcript to match the audio clip more exactly):

Run For Your Life Video [Transcript] by BraveheartedGospel.com
Sermon: Run For Your Life – Preacher: Carter Conlon

On the first Sunday following the tragedy of September 11th, 2001, Carter Conlon delivered this soul-stirring message at Times Square Church in Manhattan. The sermon was titled, Run For Your Life and it is certainly worth the effort to listen to it in its entirety:

Listen to me like you’ve never listened to me ever in your life.

We have got to lay our lives down for the purposes of God. This is not a Sunday School picnic, the church of Jesus Christ. This is not an invitation to have continuous good times. This is a war for the souls of men.

Come out from among them. Run for your life. Because this is about your life. This is not just about an opposing theology or conflicting viewpoint on Jesus, this is about your life.

My mind is forever branded with the stories that I heard of police officers from the city of New York. As people were fleeing from a crumbling building there were police officers and firemen and others that were running towards the buildings saying “Run for your life,” at their own peril. And in some cases I believe they knew they were going to die but there was a sense of duty. I was crying out to God, I said “God, oh Jesus, don’t let my sense of duty be less for Your Kingdom than these beloved firemen and policemen were for those that are perishing in a falling tower. We’re living in a generation when Truth is falling into the streets. I want to be among those that are not running away from the conflict but running into the conflict and saying, “Run for your life.”

Run from gospels that focus only on success and prosperity. Run!

Run from those who use the name of Christ only for personal gain. Run from those that are picking your pocket in the name of Jesus. Run!

Run from gospels that only focus on self improvement. Run!

Run from churches where men and not Christ are glorified. Run!

Run Body of Christ, Run! Get out! Don’t touch the unclean thing.

Run from churches in America and Canada where there is no Bible. There’s no cross in the theology. There’s no soul-searching word. There’s no repentance from sin. There’s no mention of the blood of Jesus. Run! It’s unclean. Run!

Run from churches where you’re comfortable in your sins. If you come into the house of God and you’ve got sin in your life and you’re not convicted of it, you’re at a table of devils.

Run from pulpits that are filled with political men, who are using the pulpit of God for a personal political agenda. Run!

Run from those who preach division between races and cultures. Run!

Run! Get out! Turn it off! Get away from it!

They know nothing of God.

Run from ungodly spasmodic movements and aimless empty prophesying. Beloved Church, run for your life!

Run from preachers that stand and tell stories and jokes. Run like you’ve never run before!

RUN!

RUN!

RUN!

[Like Carter Conlon, it is also my dream to warn Christians, to beg with them to flee from false teachers, from churches that are preaching false gospels.]

NOTE – Following is the entire sermon (approx. 1 hr., 16 mins.):

Click here for the transcript of this sermon.

FOR FURTHER VIEWING AND READING

Two Major Apostate Warnings

Click here for a listing of 383 free downloadable audio sermons by Carter Conlon.

Click here for the original source of this great article by Ken Ham – a Facebook note. Ken’s Facebook note is followed by many insightful reader comments.

WARNING ALL HOMESCHOOLERS
by Ken Ham (Notes) on Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 8:19am

Recently I wrote a blog about Dr. Peter Enns who was speaking at the Homeschool conference in South Carolina, and will also be speaking in Cincinnati and Pennsylvania where I will be speaking.  Check out the previous blog at:  http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2011/03/15/another-compromiser-speaking-at-homeschool-conventions/

Well, Jay Wile, also well known in Homeschool circles wrote a blog very critical of me for doing that:

http://blog.drwile.com/?p=4602

And on March 18, Jay Wile wrote a glowing report on Dr. Peter Enns:

http://blog.drwile.com/?p=4621

I would encourage you all to be like the Bereans in Acts 17, and carefully check out what Peter Enns teaches versus Scripture.  To do this, I suggest you go to the Biologos website–Peter Enns works with the Biologos Foundation.  Now be warned–this is a very liberal site–in fact, it is an organization set up to try to get the church believe in evolution and millions of years.  However, it is much more than this–if you read many of the articles and their answers to questions you will find them basically shaking their fist at God’s Word–it is a site that undermines dreadfully the authority of Scripture.  Don’t be led astray–but read for yourself at:

http://www.biologos.org/

Check out my previous blogs on Biologos at:

http://blogs.answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2009/08/15/what-are-nazarene-students-being-taught/

Here is just one of many examples of Peter Enns rejecting the plain teaching of the Bible and undermining God’s Word–He totally rejects a worldwide Flood: (Note that ultimately, it is because of what he calls the ‘geological record, at least as interpreted by mainstream scientists,’ that he rejects a literal Genesis-not just the Flood, but a literal Adam etc as you will find in his other writings).

“…It is virtually certain that one or more local floods in Mesopotamia—perhaps around 3000 B.C. according to some scholars—provide the historical basis for all the flood stories that come from that area. But the geological record, at least as interpreted by mainstream scientists, discounts any notion of a “worldwide” flood that killed every single creature on earth, save a few (Genesis 6:7; 7:21-23), a few thousand years ago.”

“…To interpret the Genesis flood as a complete global catastrophe is a modern imposition onto an ancient story. Ancients simply did not think of the earth in that way. This is where “Flood Geology” gets off on the wrong foot. Apart from the well-documented scientific problems with this approach, it expects a worldview that Genesis is not prepared to deliver.”

“…The presence of flood stories from various time periods in other parts of the ancient world (e.g., Asian, European, Mayan) does not support a global flood, as some Christian apologists try to argue. These stories simply reflect the ubiquity of floods in antiquity and the devastation that massive ones would bring. The fact that the world flood stories are so different from each other reflects how each culture told the story of their local floods in their own way.”

“…For both contextual and scientific reasons, the biblical flood story is clearly not a statement of vital historical information. It is a powerful expression of theological identity among the other peoples of the world”

Note he is saying that a literal Genesis is an ‘hypothesis.’

“…A position that claims the necessity of historicity throughout Genesis is not the default position of faith. It is an hypothesis, as much as any other, only without much explanatory force given the current state of knowledge.”

To attempt to overcome the fact that the New Testament in a number of places (eg 2 Peter 3) refers to the Flood as obviously a literal global event (and Jesus refers to the Flood as a literal event eg: Matthew 24), he states this:

“To nip in the bud a predictable objection: the slippery slope argument does not hold here. To say that the flood story is fundamentally more story than history does not mean that the crucifixion and resurrection are also unhistorical. Genesis and the Gospels are different types of literature written at very different times for very different reasons. Failing to make such basic genre distinction is perhaps at the root of some of the conflict over Genesis.”

He recognizes that the if one rejects a literal Genesis, and because the New Testament writers refer to events in Genesis over and over again, then if one rejects Genesis, why not the resurrection.  Well, right now he seems to accept the resurrection–but the next logical step is to reject this as literal, regardless of what he says.

By the way, the first time the gospel is preached in Genesis is Genesis 3:15–so I guess the gospel is not to be taken literally???

So sad–that this sort of teaching is now infiltrating the Homeschool movement.  Peter Enns is involved (along with Susan Wise Bauer) is involved with the very liberal Biologos group and involved in now producing Bible curriculum for Homeschools.  So please be warned.

Ken

FOR FURTHER READING

Christine Pack, Answers in Genesis Kicked Out of Homeschooling Conferences (04/01/2011)

Ken Ham, Peter Enns – Mutilating God’s Word (12/14/2012)

Ken Ham, Enns Continues to Promote Heresy -  Sponsored by a Baptist Church (04/20/2013)

(revised 05/01/13)


{image source: godordirt.com/creation%20image.jpg)

Years ago I had the misfortune of attending public schools. In high school, we were taught evolution, and only evolution. No Creation Science was discussed, no Intelligent Design, nothing but pagan Darwinianism. Very few students complained or protested, and very few parents at the time homeschooled. So we settled uneasily for evolution without alternative.

Today we are blessed to have other options. Christian homeschooling parents can teach their children the Truth, the facts about Creation, with total religious freedom (for now, at least, in the U.S.).

But Christian parents beware. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to find Christian homeschool curricula which take a hardline stance against evolution and for the Truth. Which is, I believe, Young Earth Creation (YEC).

(image source: http://www.motherjones.com/files/legacy/mojoblog/creation_museum.jpg)

I came across several articles which reveal what some “Christian” homeschool publishers are now providing as alternatives to YEC.  {I have emphasized certain points by bolding, and inserted comments in [brackets].) In an 04/29/13 Christianity Today article, Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra wrote:

Christian homeschool science textbooks have long taught young earth creationism (YEC) almost exclusively. But observers say a growing number of parents want texts that also teach evolution. Some of these parents still believe in a young earth, says [BioLogos] program director Kathryn Applegate, but they want their children exposed to different perspectives. [BioLogos is extremely liberal.]

“Homeschooling has broadened so much, and now includes many Christian groups who have never adopted [YEC],” said homeschool pioneer Susan Wise Bauer, a history professor at Virginia’s College of William and Mary. [Bauer is also extremely liberal.] “Also, there are a lot of younger evangelicals who have come to a different way of understanding Genesis, while still holding [on to their] evangelical roots.”

Numbers on the trend are hard to pin down. Still, BioLogos president Deborah Haarsma says that it’s “fairly common” for homeschooling families to request materials from her organization, which promotes theistic evolution. [Parents, take note - theistic evolution is heretical; do not order your science curriculum from this "Christian" homeschool publisher.] Some of these parents still believe in a young earth, says program director Kathryn Applegate, but they want their children exposed to different perspectives. [If these parents "still believe in a young earth", why are they giving their hard earned money for a curriculum that blatantly espouses theistic evolution?]

American Scientific Affiliation

Doug Hayworth, coordinator of homeschool science resources for the American Scientific Affiliation, agrees. Inquiries to his Christian association reveal not a wave of old-earth converts, but instead frustrated young-earth believers who believe that “the standard [YEC] curricula … are very strident,” said Hayworth, who homeschools. “They’re looking for some advice.” [Again, I question the real beliefs of these parents. "Strident" - according to Merriam-Webster - is defined as "characterized by harsh, insistent, and discordant sound <a strident voice>; also : commanding attention by a loud or obtrusive quality." What exactly is it about the Truth that they consider strident?]

Interesting. In an article entitled Weighing in on Ken Ham, Peter Enns and Jay Wile – Hayworth gives a great description of the “Christian evolution” conflict between these three men. But note this excerpt which shows ASA does not hold a YEC-only position: “…we do not promote only one specific position on science and faith topics. Although many ASA members have views akin to those of the BioLogos Foundation (some individual are members of both organizations), we represent a broad range of denominations, scientific disciplines and views of biblical interpretation in relation to science. This differentiates our mission from BioLogos’s mission. “ [I'm not sure how this makes ASA any better than BioLogos. Both question the validity of the YEC view - which is what counts.]

Sonlight Curriculum

Back to the Christianity Today article, which states:

Sonlight Curriculum is an exception [to the YEC-only curricula]. It offers a diversity of homeschool curricula that allow parents to teach various theories of origins. “The YEC position is strong and ingrained in the homeschool movement,” said Sonlight president Sarita Holzmann, who homeschools her children and believes in a young earth. “That might be to our detriment.” She says students need to be able to evaluate different positions.”

But does Sonlight hold strongly to the YEC position, as Sarita Holzmann claims that she believes? No! Check out this blog by “Robert”: Do Christian Homeschoolers “Embrace” Evolution?  Robert is connected with Sonlight. He never comes out and condemns “Christian” evolutionary theories. And this detailed article by Sonlight co-president John Holzmann (Sarita’s husband) questions whether we can even know that YEC is true.

This excerpt from Robert’s Sonlight blog does provide further leads concerning the views of several other Christian organizations (which perhaps publish homeschool curricula):

“Obviously, Christians reject non-theistic evolution because by definition that view excludes the supernatural and, with it, God.

But what about the other options? Young-earth creationism is promoted by organizations such as Answers in Genesis, old-earth creationism is held by Reasons to Believe, while theistic evolution is the view of Biologos. In addition, the Discovery Institute promotes what it calls Intelligent Design, which claims to remain neutral on the question of old versus young earth, but opposes theistic evolution and non-theistic evolution.”

BioLogos projects

Again, let’s look at the Christianity Today article. Here we find another red flag regarding BioLogos. Remember, BioLogos promotes theistic evolution:

With a recent grant from BioLogos, Turner and colleague Brian Eisenback, a biology professor, are writing a textbook that discusses the history of the science of origins, as well as different positions scientists have taken on Genesis and origins. They will include material on YEC, evolutionary creationism, intelligent design, and atheistic evolution.

And yet another red flag:

A similar BioLogos project is underway at Wheaton College, where five professors are working on a textbook covering the current scientific consensus on origins. [Will this textbook favor or oppose this "consensus"? Knowing that BioLogos favors theistic evolution, I'm guessing this upcoming "Christian" textbook will favor evolution-in-general.]

Sadly, Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra’s Christianity Today article does not condemn any “Christian” homeschooling publisher for pushing theistic evolution.

Besides BioLogos, I hope to locate other “Christian” homeschool publishers which are pushing theistic evolution and other non-YEC theories as the Truth. And mark my word, theistic evolution is an evolutionary theory; it is not Creation. Click here for one of many Christian discernment articles blasting theistic evolution as evolution-in-disguise.

Bottom line – It is an honorable thing for Christian homeschool publishers to prepare students for the world’s evolutionary arguments, by warning them about evolutionary theories.  (To its credit, the Christianity Today article does mention this practice of warning children.) But beware “Christian” homeschool publishers which cast doubt on YEC and discuss alternatives to YEC, claiming that an evolutionary alternative may be the truth.

FOR FURTHER READING

Articles exposing BioLogos publisher as being liberal:

Homeschool Controversy: Anti-Bible, Bible Curriculum! – This article mentions the liberal BioLogos publisher, as well as the liberal Peacehill Press. An excerpt: “I have watched anti-Bible books  infiltrate and grow in the homeschool movement over the years. Satan does not want us to teach our children truth. What better place to attack the Christians than to get to homeschool teachers. We are training the next Christian generation.”

Henry Morris III, An Inconvenient Truth – This article provides a good introduction to the various views of creation and evolution. Also, Dr. Morris mentions BioLogos.

Articles FAVORING the new wave of Christian homeschool textbooks including evolutionary theories:

List of BioLogos articles mentioning homeschooling

Evolution and Christianity: 1. Christian homeschooling parents dismayed by creationist textbooks, accommodationist books on the way

Peter Enns (a founder of BioLogos), Not All Homeschoolers Think Adam Had a Pet Dinosaur, Which is Good

David R. Wheeler, Old Earth, Young Minds: Evangelical Homeschoolers Embrace Evolution

The Old-Earth Christian homeschooling vacuum

Forum discussion: Books on creation, progressive creationism, and theistic evolution

———————————————————————————–

To find more articles on this issue, Google this search string:
["homeschool" "evolution" "publishers"]

Also, try this search string:
["homeschool convention" "evolution"]

At several times in the past several years, I have discussed the Trinity with Oneness Pentecostals, and well as evangelicals who are not quite sure there is a Trinity. One of the major questions is whether a person can be become a born again Christian without believing in the Trinity.

Many born again Christians believe a person cannot become born again without believing in the Trinity. I came across an excellent article which explains why this is.  I have reposted the entire article below; click here for the original source. I have emphasized certain points by bolding in orange, and inserted comments [in brackets in bolded orange].

————————————————————————————-

whitedragonawa
February 16, 2012

Why Modalism Is A Damnable Heresy

 In light of the recent T.D. Jakes controversy and Modalism I decided to write this article to better explain the problem with this heresy. Too many times Christians have no clue how to explain why Modalism is a damnable heresy because they do not understand its conclusions. Modalism is nothing new and pops in and out of the spotlight all of the time. In fact, while I lived in Eugene, Oregon my dad and other men from our Southern Baptist church battled with Modalists who were members of our church, but secretly involved in the United Pentecostal Church. The men were actually teaching sunday school for the youth group males, as well as trying to befriend many of the men of the church and influence them. They were trying to take over our church from the inside. This is the church I was baptized in when I was 15.

One day I was taken on a trip with the main leader of these 3 Oneness Pentecostals who told my parents it would be good for me. His son came with us and we ended up going really far away, near the coast and meeting up with a large group of people to help build a church. We were installing drywall and helping pull wires through the ceiling. It so happened that the church was a United Pentecostal Church that I was helping do work for. He deceptively brought me on the trip to help his heretical church brothers fix up one of their church buildings. His deception was very strong as he accomplished the manipulation and brainwashing of 2 of our church men. The 2 men teamed up with him in order to attract more of the men so they would bring their families into their den of wolves. Heresy within an orthodox church has the tendency to become a zombie-like infestation that deadens the minds of men and puts them under the control of demonic influence.

Another even worse issue was that the main leader of the 2 other heretics was having secret communion meetings behind the church outside on certain nights. He invited my parents to come once, and it was people who did not belong to our church, strangers they never saw before. They were having some kind of worship meeting and communion. They had set up a small tent covering in the back parking lot. At the time, my parents were new to the church so did not realize what was going on at that moment. Eventually, these wolves in sheep’s clothing were exposed and kicked out of the church, but not after many instense debates, arguments, and spiritual attacks.

Too many people want to explain something as a heresy simply because a council said so, and not because of a biblical understanding of why it is heresy. Heresy makes salvation impossible so it is good to understand why it is so with Modalism and why it is worthwile to put fourth the spiritual energy to fight it and reject it outside of the Church just like my father and other men from our average sized church in Oregon did over a decade ago…

Introduction

Modalism (also know as Sabellianism [named after Sabellius, the heretic priest from the 3rd century that promoted this heresy], Modalistic Monarchianism, Modal Monarchianism, Oneness, and Patrapassionism [which means the Father suffers in Latin]) is the belief that God is only one person and changes/shifts into different modes. This is a heresy that leads a person to Hell because any incorrect belief about the nature of God cancels out salvation by default. This default happens in different ways but always occurs. Modalism leads people to Hell just like any other heresy about God’s nature. Modalists deny the Trinity, and in most cases with extreme aggression. Unfortunately, many Christians have a hard time logically expressing why this belief is a damnable heresy. This heresy is an extremely strategically, deceptive heresy which tries to mask itself and blend in with Orthodoxy. It fools many evangelicals. Unlike other anti-Trinitarian beliefs that deny the deity of Christ, this heresy embraces the deity of their “Christ” hence why it is so deceptive (note: there is another less popular form of Modalism that denies Christ’s deity called Adoptionism, but is not the focus of this article). Modalists claim to love Jesus Christ and claim He is God, yet in reality Modalism denies Jesus Christ and is an antichrist religion. It is a very destructive belief and total blasphemy. Without a deep understanding of soteriology and the nature of God, Christians can be confused on how to explain why Modalism is heresy. This article will attempt to do so.

Who are Modalists?

Modalism has been a problem since the early Church and still continues to be a problem today. The main proponent of Modalism in modern times is the cult called the United Pentecostal Church (UPC). The televangelist, charlatan “Bishop” T.D. Jakes is affiliated with this group. Another cult that is almost as big as the UPC are the United Apostolic Churches (UAC). These groups are known as Oneness Pentecostals, and still, there are lesser known sects and individuals who promote a modalistic God. MacArthur (2007) states, “As these groups and their popular spokespersons have found increasing acceptance in the evangelical mainstream, modalism is suddenly being accepted as if it were a valid evangelical option” (p. 117). In some circumstances, people make the mistake of expressing God in a modalistic way to express the three Persons of God, such as using H2O as an example of three things being one which causes people to misunderstand the Trinity (i.e. water, ice, and vapor are different things but all three are still H2O, yet H2O is never all three at the same time). Some people mistakenly believe in a modalistic God out of ignorance of how to describe the Three Persons mentioned in the Bible. People try too hard to explain God and end up using human wisdom to describe God and are not satisfied with leaving the Triune nature of God as a mystery. True believers, who make such mistakes out of ignorance, eventually (and most of the time quickly), come to the realization that God truly exists in Three distinct persons who are not the same, yet comprise of ONE Eternal Being. This is why Christianity uses the term Trinity which means TRI-UNITY as in three-as-one. True Christians become satisfied with this mystery and accept it as just that, a mystery. No one can fully understand how God is, but Christians can know what God is because the Bible teaches it.

The type of people who come to understand that the biblical truth of God is the Trinity are people who care to know correct doctrines and want to love the true God and will seek out proper knowledge of the Bible. Sadly, most Modalists have absolutely no desire for seeking actual truth and want to force their opinions into the Bible because they have personal agendas. A truly innocently ignorant follower of a modalistic god will always repent within due time, without much division, strife, or aggression against Trinitarians. The others are simply heretics whom are inspired by Satan and will always fight a losing battle against the Trinity until they die and go to Hell. Unfortunately, the latter makes up the major portion of Modalists and always has. You can see the demonic minds of these reprobates expressed all over the internet, especially YouTube.

Modalism promotes a god that changes

Modalism contradicts what Christianity has historically accepted about the nature of God. True Christianity expresses God existing in three Persons that equal one Being. This belief is given the theological title of “Holy Trinity” to express this concept. Whereas, in Modalism God is expressed as existing in only one person that shifts into different modes and moves in different ways in different times throughout history. God “shape shifts” so to speak, from the Father at one time, changing into the Son another time, and also changing into the Holy Spirit at times. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit never exist at the same time in Modalism. The UPC and Apostolics call their god “Jesus” and they baptize their congregants strictly, only in that name. “Jesus Christ” is the proper name of God to them which covers the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Their “Jesus” god is all three: the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but the modes are never shifted into at the same time. Their god is a changing god. This contradicts what the Bible teaches in Hebrews 13:8 which states firmly: “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.” What is annoying is that many of these Oneness followers illogically use this same verse to somehow promote the Trinity being false. It is a fact that their religion is not at all based on logic when exegeting the Bible. What Oneness/Modalism promotes essentially, is, that Almighty God being only one person, died on the cross. Logically, this would mean that the Father came down and died on the cross but just shape shifted into the Son. So there is no actual different person of God dying on the cross. It is the same person dying on the cross, the same person giving itself as a sacrifice, and the same person accepting itself back into heaven. Modalism claims another “Father” that schizophrenically changes his personality by shifting into different modes. How can anyone trust a God who changes so sporadically? How can we even be sure there are only three modes of God? There might be more. This is a critical mistake! Not to mention it makes absolutely no sense!

Oneness followers love to use isolated proof texts from the Bible or misrepresent a verse’s surrounding context, and also ignore related passages in the Bible. One of their favorite verses they will quote is Isaiah 9:6 which says,

For a child will be born for us, a son will be given to us, and the government will be on His shoulders. He will be named Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.”

Oneness heretics will claim that this proves that Jesus Christ is the Father and only shifted His mode into the Son. The Son did not exist until the Father turned into Him. This verse does call the child Eternal Father, but that is only stating a fact about His Godhood, that Jesus Christ is fully God and God is our Eternal Father. Not that Jesus Christ is actually God the Father. Related passages in the Bible about Jesus Christ and God the Father explain it so.

The concept of the Holy Trinity is all over the Bible. The actual beliefs of the Trinity are misrepresented by Modalists who claim it promotes three gods and not one. This is not true. The Trinity teaches that all 3 Persons are different from each other and not the same, yet they are all One and the same God. The Father is 100% fully God, the Son is 100% fully God, and the Holy Spirit is 100% fully God. But the Father is not the Son, is not the Holy Spirit. The Son is not the Father, is not the Holy Spirit. And the Holy Spirit is not the Father, is not the Son. Yet all three Persons are one God, the same God. This teaching is all over the Bible and it is a mystery that we cannot understand, but we must accept. God: Father, Son, Holy Spirit is our Eternal, Everlasting Father.

Modalism cancels out salvation by default

The most basic reason why Modalism cancels out salvation is that if the Trinity is true, it means that God is Three-As-One and anything other than a triune God does not exist. Worshiping a God that does not exist is idolatry. Modalism is a false religion and God commands that there should never be any other gods worshiped besides Him (Exodus 20:3). There is no forgiveness of sins if a person puts their trust into a false god. Just because the name of a false God uses the same titles and names as the true, triune God of Scripture does not mean it is the same God. Matthew 24:24 claims there will be false Christ’s coming, and 1 Corinthians 11:4 says that people can preach a different Jesus and a different spirit and Christians should not put up with it. Simply labeling something as Jesus does not change the fact it is a lie from Satan.

Another more complex reason that will help Christians explain on a deeper level why Modalism leads people to Hell is that logically, if the Trinity exists, Modalism cannot provide salvation because it does not give Christ credit for His atoning work on the cross. Romans 8:2 explains that there is no condemnation for Christians “because the Spirit’s law of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death.” If the Trinity is true it means that only the Person of Jesus Christ died for the sins of the world. John 3:16 says that God sent His “only begotten Son” to die for those who believe. If someone rejects that there is a Person of the Son and instead claims there is only one person that changes, and the Son did not exist until He was manifest in the Incarnation of Christ, then there is no atoning sacrifice that actually happened since they reject the real Person of Jesus, the Son of God who actually exists and has existed eternally. Grudem (2000) affirms,

“[M]odalism ultimately loses the heart of the doctrine of the atonement– that is, the idea that God sent his Son as a substitutionary sacrifice, and that the Son bore the wrath of God in our place, and that the Father, representing the interests of the Trinity, saw the suffering of Christ and was satisfied” (p. 242).

Christians cannot accept Modalists as brothers in the Lord, and they should never be unequally yoked with Modalistic darkness. The modalistic god denies the Eternal Person of the Son, thus meaning they deny the true God and profane His atonement.

Without the Person of Jesus the Atonement is denied

What Modalism is actually saying is that the separate person of Jesus Christ, the Son, is not real and never died on the cross because He does not exist. A separate Person does not exist. Only the Father (or Almighty God) exists and changes his face to turn into and look like the Son. This is a bold denial of God as a whole (since Jesus Christ is fully 100% God) and a denial of the work of the existing Second Person of God: the Son.

A human example would be that a Father agreed with his son that he would go out and pay an extremely expensive price for criminals to be free from their death sentences, and that his son would own them and they would be given to him; and he would show them compassion. After hearing about freedom from their judicial punishments of death because of the son’s payment, those criminals— instead of going with the son who bought them— believe the father is actually the one who bought them because he morphed into the mode of the son. Furthermore, the criminals claim that the son who actually bought them with his father’s urging does not even exist. They believe only the father exists and shifts into a different looking mode to become his own son, but is still the exact same person as there is not a son person and a father person, but only a father person who shifts modes. He just changed into the son. So the son who actually bought them with an extremely expensive price is denied as well as his hard work earning the payment for them to be free. This is a major insult to the son. But in reality the only way they could be free is if they understand that the son is actually a real person who exists and is not the father, and they follow him. Because since these criminals deny the son who bought them, and instead believe his father shape shifted into a son to become him, that real son that exists separately from his father will deny them in the presence of his father.

Modalism denies Jesus Christ. The Bible teaches that if you deny Jesus Christ (being the Son of God, a separate Person from the Father, and separate from the Person of the Holy Spirit), He will deny you in the presence of God the Father. Jesus Christ Himself said, “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when He comes in His glory and that of the Father and the holy angels” (Luke 9:26). Jesus in Luke 12:9 also said, “…but whoever denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God.” So it is obvious that Modalism denies Christ despite the fact they try to claim they promote Jesus and follow Him. The Oneness “Jesus” is a “false Jesus” that does not exist and profanes, and blasphemies the true living, eternal, Son of God. It misplaces credit for propitiation onto the Father, when propitiation was strictly something the Son did. Romans 3:23 says that the redemption is in Christ Jesus, and in verse 24 it says, “God presented Him as the propitiation through faith in His blood, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His restraint God passed over sins previously committed.” It does not say that the Father was the propitiation. 1 John 2:2 explicitly states that Jesus Christ alone was the propitiation: “He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not only for ours, but also for those of the whole world.” Since the Trinity is true, Modalism is denying God by claiming the Person of the Son does not exist. 1 John 2:23 expresses it simply, “No one who denies the Son can have the Father…” All repentant sinners become Christians who receive salvation. Christians are saved because they call on the name of the Lord and confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. If someone repents to a false God that does not exist, one that denies the existence of the Person of the Son, they will not have salvation. Romans 10:9 says, “…if you confess with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved.” If a person claims this verse for a Modalistic Jesus, one that denies the Person of the Son, there is no power for salvation.

Modalism denies the Father’s ability to be a righteous judge

Not only is Modalism an offense to the Person of the Son, but it offends the Person of the Father by ignoring His sacrificial giving of His one and only Son, the Son which He loves so much in relation within the Godhead; and it claims instead that He is the one who died and gave the propitiation for sins. Ignoring the extreme sacrifice the Father allowed to happen to His precious Son is an extreme insult to the love of the Father for sinners that He would allow His own Son (who was willing) to be punished in their place; and not only that, but that the Father is the one who gave out all of the crushing punishment to His own Son. Isaiah 54:6 says, “The LORD has punished Him for the iniquity of us all.” Also, 2 Corinthians 5:21 states, “He made the One who did not know sin to be sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” Modalism denies God this glory and insults the Father. The Father remained pure and untouched by sin and is the righteous judge that gave out His wrath onto Christ. If Modalism is true it means that God existing in one person, being the Father would have became sinful and then killed himself. There would be no righteous judge untouched by sin able to pour out the wrath. It would be the Father becoming sin on His own and then punishing Himself. This idea cancels out a pure and holy Person who is able to remain innocent who can judge sin. In reality, since the Trinity is what is true, there is a righteous and clean judge untouched by sin that was able to pour out His wrath onto Jesus Christ (who was made sin willingly by the Father) and complete the ability for salvation to be completed. To deny the Father’s giving of His real eternally existing Son is blasphemy, and it cancels out the ability for salvation. Such a person as the “god father” of Modalism does not exist and it profanes the true Father’s work. Therefore, Modalism completely denies the true Father.

1 John 2:22 firmly states, “He is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.” 

Modalism denies the Holy Spirit

Not only does Modalism deny Christ, and the Father, it also denies the Holy Spirit and claims He is also the same as the Father. That would mean the Person of the Holy Spirit (who is 100% fully God as well) according to the Trinity does not exist, thus denying God completely. Nonetheless, Modalism is idolatry and an offense to the true God and will be punished on judgment day.

The Incarnation’s salvific power is cancelled out   

Modalism cancels out the ability for an actual human/God existence in Jesus (a conclusion that the Adoptionist form of Modalism understands). Jesus Christ is 100% man and 100% God at the same time. This is the dual nature of Christ concept that true Christians believe. Jesus Christ, who is God, came in the flesh (John 1:1, John 1:14) and was a blood sacrifice for our sins. Romans 7:4 says, “Therefore, my brothers, you also were put to death in relation to the law through the crucified body of the Messiah.” If God is only one person then it would mean that Jesus Christ is the same person as the Father. If Modalism was true it would be that Christ’s will as a human would not at all be different from the will of the Father because they are the same person. But the Bible says in Mark 14:36, John 6:38, and Luke 22:42 that Jesus was not doing His own will, but the will of His Father. If Modalism was true these verses would be contradicting this “one person only god” by expressing that Christ’s will as a human and His God will were not unified. This would mean that Jesus Christ as a human was not God, and that God must have possessed a human person that is not God.

Consequently, only God is infinitely valuable and perfect to be able to die for the sins of mankind in order to save them. One human could only atone for one life, but God could atone for everyone because of His infinite value. Also, humans are not perfect and never can be because all of them are born in sin. Romans 3:10 states, “There is no one righteous, not even one,” and Jesus Christ Himself expressed, “No one is good but One— God” (Mark 10:18, Luke 18:19). Even if God created a human body or a human person that was perfect, that He could fill up, it would still not be infinitely valuable. The fact is the Bible teaches that God paid for His people in His own blood (Acts 20:28). Therefore, God died for the sins of His elect which forces Modalism’s logical conclusion to be that Jesus’s humanity was not unified with God which means it could not possibly have provided salvation. There is no salvific power in the “Modalist’s incarnate Jesus.”

Conclusion

Hopefully, this article has effectively addressed the reasons why Modalism is a serious heresy, and is not to be taken lightly. Especially, it is not to be accepted as a valid, non-essential doctrine within the bounds of orthodoxy. Modalism completely denies the true God and creates a false god that does not exist. Modalism’s logical conclusion is self defeat. It denies all three Persons of God and commits theological suicide. It denies the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as well as the humanity of Christ that atoned for sin. Modalism is an illogical heresy and needs to be aggressively refuted in evangelical circles. Too many people are confused and unable to understand the mechanics of this heresy because it is so deceptive. It is nothing but a device of Satan and demonically energized within theological circles to lead people astray so that they will burn in Hell for eternity. Modalism is truly a damnable heresy.

References

Grudem, W. (2000). Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.

MacArthur, J. (2007). The Truth War. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

Apparently there is some confusion as to whether three day retreats like “Emmaus Walk” and “Tres Dias” are heretical. I believe they are. Here we are going to look mainly at Tres Dias, but below you will find that Emmaus Walk and Tres Dias came from the same origin. These and other types of three day retreats are all part of the  Three Day Movement, according to a Wikipedia article.

Note – below I have emphasized certain points by bolding, and inserted comments in [brackets].

The Wikipedia article on Tres dias does not make mention of heretical teachings.  Yet, The Cutting Edge website gives a different picture:

These “total immersion experiences” that Rome uses to indoctrinate her followers has found its way into the Southern Baptists as well through the Tres dias. The Cursillo Movement, which originated in the Roman Catholic church and sprung out of Focolare, is a three-day learning, sharing experience of living in a Christian community. Tres dias is one of three major spiritual renewal movements that emerged from the Cursillo Movement. In an article by Todd Starnes, he tells of one Baptist preacher, Paul Mason’s concerns:

“When several members of a Georgia Baptist church were invited to attend a weekend of spiritual renewal, their pastor, Paul Mason, didn’t give it a second thought. After all, “Tres dias” (Spanish for three days) sounded like it was a normal, weekend getaway sponsored by a mainline religious denomination. But a few months after they returned from the retreat, Mason realized he had a problem on his hands at Central Baptist Church, Douglasville. ‘When I asked them how the retreat went, they told me it was a secret. They couldn’t talk about what happened during the weekend,’ he said. Mason noticed that couples who had attended the Tres dias retreat were secretly inviting other couples to attend the program. After the church’s Sunday school superintendent went to the retreat, he abruptly resigned his church position without reason. And within six months, Mason said the couples who had initially attended Tres dias completely ostracized themselves from the congregation. The result, Mason said, was a divided church. Determined to learn all he could about Tres dias, Mason uncovered some unsettling information about a spiritual movement that is raising concern in the Southern Baptist Convention. Davis said a number of Southern Baptist churches have contacted his office with stories of problems resulting from the retreats. ‘It’s very strange. Some church members have done extreme things, selling possessions, becoming secretive. It’s almost like the weekend retreat has become the focus of their spiritual lives.’ George Osment, a lay leader at First Baptist Church, Scottsboro, Tenn., said the spiritual intensity is so great that leaders of one Tres dias retreat refused to allow a camper to leave. ‘This person wanted to go home but they wouldn’t let him. He saw what was going on and wanted to leave,’ Osment said. ‘They formed a circle around him and prayed over him.’ Osment said the secrecy surrounding the retreat has caused division in their congregation. ‘It’s very sad,’ he said. Said Davis: ‘Anything that involves a measure of secrecy sends up a red flag. There’s no need for anybody in a Christian church to keep anything secret.’”

And apparently Bro. David Cloud discussed this, in an article which I could no longer locate on his website. I am reposting the article by Bro. Cloud on this, which I found here, prefaced by an introductory comment as follows:

Below is an article by David Cloud I found a few years back. Unfortunately I didn’t save the link. Cursillo movements have been popular in Georgia since the 90s. “Walk to Emmaus” is part of the Cursillo movement and is usually associated with Methodist churches although people from various denominations attend. Tres Dias is another one.

Beware Of Ecumenical Weekend Retreat Movements

By David Cloud

Weekend retreats that emphasize spiritual renewal are becoming increasingly popular with church members, but believers must beware of the teachings and fellowships that are often experienced at such meetings. While many Christians with good intentions may think a renewal weekend will help their Christian walk and witness, many such weekend retreats are Charismatic and ecumenical in nature. Three movements that have become popular of late are Tres Dias, The Emmaus Walk and Chrysalis (aimed at teenagers). These retreat movements have emerged from the Roman Catholic Church’s Cursillo Movement and are now often sponsored by mainline denominations. The Tres Dias Movement, which broke off from a United Methodist Cursillo Movement in the 1980′s and is now nondenominational, describes itself in the following manner: “Christian, ecumenical, similar to the Cursillo movements, a Christian support group movement, a prayer/study/action small group movement.”

Recently, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) warned its members to be wary of the Cursillo-type movements, saying that such movements are secretive and divisive. SBC’s Tal Davis told Baptist Press that the focus of those who attend the Tres Dias weekend retreats “is no longer on the gospel or evangelism, rather the experience they’ve had” (BP, 12-29-99). According to Baptist Press, Davis has heard from a number of SBC churches who have reported problems as a result of the retreats. “Some church members have done extreme things, selling possessions, becoming secretive. It’s almost like the weekend retreat has become the focus of their spiritual lives,” Davis said. Paul Mason, pastor of Central Baptist Church (SBC) in Douglasville, Georgia, said those within his church who attended the retreat were secretly inviting others to attend. When he asked about the retreat, those who attended told him it was a secret and that they could not discuss what happened during the weekend of the retreat.

Mason noted that “one area of concern is the potential for participants to manifest Charismatic tendencies” (BP, 12-29-99). Defenders of the Tres Dias and other Cursillo-type movements reject the notion that these movements are Charismatic and secretive. Wilson Burton, Jr., a member of a Church of Christ congregation and a member of Tres Dias’ international board, told Baptist Press that even though some who attend the retreats experience Charismatic manifestations ranging from laughter to healing, Tres Dias is not Charismatic. “It is an encounter with the Holy Spirit,” Burton said. “The ministry is ecumenical in nature and actively seeks the participation of persons from all Christian denominations” (BP, 1-18-00). He also told Baptist Press that Tres Dias does not preach one theology but rather stresses what all denominations hold in common.

A careful look at the orientation, history and essentials of the Tres Dias movement, and other Cursillo-type retreat movements, reveals that such movements are unashamedly ecumenical in scope. One Baptist Press article noted that “Baptist, Lutheran, Church of God or Catholics, among others, may be represented on any given weekend” (BP, 1-18-00). Likewise, such retreats are often dominated by Charismatics within each of the denominations. No Bible-believing Fundamentalist should have any part of such a fellowship.

FOR FURTHER READING

Christian discernment articles exposing the Cursillo movement

The Cursillo movement is much larger than Tres Dias and Emmaus Walk, which are listed under Analogous Retreats in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursillo

And this article is also very helpful and revealing. It is about DeColores, which also falls under the Cursillo movement: http://www.michianachristianembassy.com/web_documents/decolores-many_colors__many_questions.pdf

Christian discernment articles exposing Tres Dias

Todd Starnes, NAMB official cautions churches to be wary of renewal weekends (Dec 29, 1999)

Christian discernment articles exposing Walk to Emmaus

Walk to Emmaus and Churches of Christ


Click below for the various parts of this series on mindfulness:

New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” invading preschools and public grade schools nationwide – including Canton, Ohio’s Plain Local School District

Who is Congressman Tim Ryan, and why is he pushing New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” in public schools?
——————————————————————————————

Now on to the current blog:

Who is Congressman Tim Ryan, and why is he pushing New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” in public schools?
(revised 04/02/13)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/elizaio/5485585137/
CAPTION:  Soren [Gordhamer], Congressman Tim Ryan, and Jon Kabat-Zinn discuss Mindfulness, Politics and Society: Extending into the World
[at the Wisdom 2.0 Conference 2011]

Among the fifty states, Ohio could hardly be considered the most liberal, or the most anti-Christian, or the most New Age state. Yet, for whatever reason, a young Congressional Representative from Ohio – Tim Ryan – has become a darling of New Agers. Why? Because he has become a strong advocate of New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” (also called “mindfulness meditation”). I am especially concerned that he is pushing this practice for public schools – including preschools and grade schools.

A number of New Agers are endorsing Ryan’s new book A Mindful Nation. Ryan is also pushing legislation that will increase the practice of mindfulness in public schools.  Other  New Agers championing mindfulness in public schools are Jon Kabat-Zinn and Goldie Hawn.

http://www.today.com/moms/goldie-hawn-helps-kids-get-zen-smart-837758

CAPTION: Rep. Tim Ryan, D-OH, practices meditation with kids at Robert Coleman Elementary School in Baltimore.

So when and how did Ryan get involved in mindfulness (also called “mindfulness meditation”)? Check out excerpts from this interview (I have emphasized certain points by bolding in orange, and inserted comments [in brackets in bolded orange].

Q: Why did you write this book?

A: The book came out of my going around the county to meet scientists studying mindfulness; teachers using it in schools; health care practitioners implementing it in our health care system; our military using it to treat veterans and build mental resilience. And I thought the world needed to see what they are doing. They are pioneers in what will be the next great movement in the United States: the movement of mindfulness.

Q: When did your interest in mindfulness start?

A: It started a long time ago. My grandparents and my mom prayed the rosary a lot, and later in life I had a priest friend of mine teach me centering prayer, based on Father Thomas Keating’s work. That led to practicing different kinds of meditation off and on as I got older.

Q: And when did you begin to consistently practice meditation?

A: I had been running extremely hard with my job and traveling across Ohio and the country to help Democrats take back the House in 2006, and then there was the presidential election. I was 35 and I thought, “I’m going to be burned out by the time I’m 40. I really need to jump-start my meditation practice.” Two days after the presidential election, I spent five days at a retreat [led by mindfulness "guru" Jon Kabat-Zinn] in increasing levels of silence. It reminded me of how I felt when I played sports: being in “the zone” with mind and body grounded in the present moment.

Q: And you continue to meditate every day?

A: Yes, 40 to 45 minutes every morning before I leave the house and go out into the world…

After some discussion of “Washington politics”, the interview continues as follows:

Q: Because of mindfulness’ Buddhist roots, a lot of people think it’s a religious practice. How does your meditation relate to your Catholic faith?

A: If you love your neighbor and are compassionate, are you automatically a Christian? Practicing present-moment awareness does not entail joining any religion or accepting any belief system. [Yes it does - the core of mindfulness is a New Age/Buddhist worldview.] As a Catholic, I find mindfulness helps me participate in my religion more wholeheartedly. If you are praying the rosary, participating in the rituals at Mass or listening to the priest preach, you will actually be paying attention! Whatever your religion is, it can enhance the experience of participating in that religion. What’s more beautiful than that?

Q: There do seem to be some Buddhist concepts in your book, such as the interconnectedness of all beings. Has meditation made you more interested in Buddhist philosophy?

A: I love studying different religions. For me, learning and drawing from the different religious traditions is essential to being a good public servant. And the connections between our various religious traditions become our public ethic; they tie us together.

And in a 2012 article originally posted here, a Buddhist website asks Youngstown, Ohio Congressional Representative (D) Tim Ryan:

How have you helped introduce mindfulness in the education system?

Ryan replies:

About three years ago [2009] I got a million dollars to put social and emotional learning and mindfulness in two school districts in Ohio, and the teachers have responded in a wonderful way. In the Warren City School District they just added another fifty teachers—the teachers who were in the program spoke so highly about it that other teachers wanted to do it too. The programs we’re running also have a parental component. Parents are learning how teachers are talking to the kids about being aware of their emotions. This makes a connection with the families. Mindfulness is not a silver bullet. But there’s nothing else right now cutting against the huge influx of information and technology coming at our kids. We want to give kids the ability to choose what they put their attention on. I’ve seen it in my own district— parents and teachers love it.

FOR FURTHER READING

List of Google hits on ["Tim Ryan" "centering prayer" "mindfulness"]

Christian discernment articles critiquing Ryan

Stand Up for the Truth!, U.S. Congressman Advocates Mindful Meditation as Solution to Global Conflict – followed by links to a number of additional Christian discernment articles

Lighthouse Trails Research, Ohio Congressman Tim Ryan’s Meditation Crusade – Hopes to Influence Other Congress Members (and All Americans)

Religious (but not necessarily Christian) articles mentioning Ryan’s motives and Catholic background

Lisa Joan Reardon, Mindfulness and Centering Prayer (08/06/12)

Ohio congressman Tim Ryan on a mission to bring meditation to the masses

Buddhist articles favoring Ryan

Politically Aware: A Q&A with Congressman TIM RYAN

Congressman Tim Ryan to talk “A Mindful Nation” at InsightLA fundraiser, June 4 [2012]

Secular articles favoring Ryan

CASEL, Congressman Tim Ryan, U.S. Representative, 17th District, Ohio
Mary Utne O’Brien Award for  Excellence in Expanding the Evidence-Based Practice of Social and Emotional Learning in the Area of Policy

Tim Ryan, Ohio Congressman, Shares His Mindfulness Vision For The Country – Arianna Huffington, editor of the Huffington Post, graduated from the New Age University of Santa Monica mentioned in this article

Washington was making Rep. Tim Ryan sick … until he found mindfulness

Click below for the various parts of this series on mindfulness:

New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” invading preschools and public grade schools nationwide – including Canton, Ohio’s Plain Local School District

Who is Congressman Tim Ryan, and why is he pushing New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” in public schools?

———————————————————————-

Now on to the current blog:

New Age/Buddhist “mindfulness” invading preschools and public grade schools nationwide – including Canton, Ohio’s Plain Local School District
(revised 04/06/13)

http://www.blogher.com/files/yoga_kids_hero.jpg

I was recently reading yet another article about how the ACLU is fighting against any display or practice of Christianity in public schools. Then I stumbled across news articles praising the inclusion of another religion’s practices in public schools. Namely, an occult New Age-ish Buddhist practice called “mindfulness meditation” or simply “mindfulness”, being implemented in preschools and public grade schools nationwide. One example can be found at Warstler Elementary School, a Plain Local grade school near Canton, Ohio. (In fact, school administrators plan to implement mindfulness in all of this school district’s schools!)

Click here for a Wikipedia article on the Buddhist origins of  mindfulness. And click here for a Wikipedia article on the adaptation of Buddhist mindfulness for psychology.

Several questions I have:

1) Why was this reported in the  Akron Beacon Journal – a county away – not in the local Canton newspaper (The Repository)?
2) Since this was not reported locally, how many parents in Plain Local School District are even aware this is going on?
3) To Plain Local Christian parents who are aware this is going on: are you protesting and pulling your children out to be homeschooled? If not, why not?

Unfortunately, mindfulness is being implemented in preschools and gradeschools nationwide. This is a abomination. The fact that it is being implemented at such a young age is proof, as I see it, that New Agers are trying to indoctrinate our public school/”government school” students into occult New Age practices. These words of our Lord Jesus Christ come to mind:

1) “Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!  2) It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones” (Luke 17:1-2) .

I have reposted much of the article on this, from the Akron Beacon Journal. Click here for the original site of this article, in its original format and wording. On the original website, the article is followed by 41 comments as of 03/22/13; I hope to incorporate some of the comments into this blog.  In the excerpts below, I have emphasized certain points by bolding, and inserted comments in [brackets]. I have also inserted links to pertinent Internet articles. (Note – I do not feel comfortable reposting the entire article verbatim. I am in the process of revising my blog, whittling it down from a repost of the entire article to just include excerpts from the article along with paraphrases of pertinent sections.)

Ironically, Warstler Elementary School was rented out to High Mill Church of the Resurrection for years in the 1980s-90s for their church services [before High Mill became involved with Richard Foster's heretical Spiritual Formation ala Spiritual Directors and spiritual retreats]. I can picture the setting of today’s Buddhist practices: 330 students and teachers chanting, meditating, “praying”, etc. in the very same gymnasium where High Mill once worshipped and praised our Lord Jesus Christ. Sickening!

Check out these Christian discernment articles exposing  the occult side of mindfulness. Several of the articles deal with mindfulness being taught to preschool and grade school children:

Marcia Montenegro, More on Mindfulness: Never Mind the Mind (March 2010)

Marcia Montenegro, Mindfulness: No-mind Over Matter (November 2010)

Marcia Montenegro, Mindfulness Goes to Kindergarten (Jan. 2012)

New Age and the Dangers of Mindfulness (audio interview between Stand Up for the Truth! and Marcia Montenegro)(Feb. 2012)

SBrinkman, Goldie Hawn Pushing TM and Buddhism in Public Schools
(February 27, 2012)  – I oppose Catholicism, but this Catholic article is very helpful for researchers; although not mentioned in the title, the article covers mindfulness

Before proceeding, check out this YouTube video favoring mindful education nationwide – a practice being implemented behind the backs of Christian parents:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMK481p5wWM

The article reposted below describes how Warstler Elementary School counselor Joel McNenny has initiated a “mindfulness” program. Beware – Joel McNenny is more than just a school counselor. As of March 2013, he deals with “Mindful Solutions”, working for a New Age business called Total Health and Wellness Center of Ohio  in Canton. One of their Facebook sections says this:

We have established a Wellness Center that serves the physical and emotional needs of individuals for all of Northeast Ohio.

Dr.’s Hatcher and Kucyk believe that healing involves the body, mind and spirit. They hold a vision that the mind plays a profound role in the healting process.

Standard medical treatments usually target single body parts or systems with the use of prescription drugs and surgical interventions that have provided great benefits but may also lead to greater health risks and thus greater health costs.

Our Health and Wellness Center provides an “integrative approach” to standard medicine. We look at the entire person and work to improve their symptoms through mindfulness / stress reduction, psychotherapy, acupuncture, massage / reflexology, yoga / tai chi and other supportive therapies.

We work in collaboration with hospitals and are available as a referral source to other health care providers.

Another section of their Facebook Page states this:

The Total Health and Wellness Center is dedicated to the growth and wisdom of the “individual” with a focus on improving their overall health through integrating services which balance mind, body and spirit. We provide the following services: -Acupuncture -Mindfulness Counseling -Massage Therapy -Yoga/ Praise Moves -Tai Chi -Meditation

Additional New Age info can be found on their website. Facebook mentions that one of their yoga teachers is Rhonda Kuster, who also teaches at The Yoga Place in North Canton, where there are many other individuals listed teaching New Age practices.

Long story short: it appears that Warstler Elementary School counselor Joel McNenny associates with numerous individuals promulgating New Age practices locally.

Now on to the Beacon Journal article:

Plain school district teaching students ‘mindfulness’

By Stephanie Warsmith
Beacon Journal staff writer

Published: December 29, 2012 – 10:39 PM | Updated: December 30, 2012 – 01:10 PM

civmindful30carousel_0010A

Joel McNenny (center), school counselor, leads mindfulness movements to help students focus and relax in his mindfulness classes. (Paul Tople/Akron Beacon Journal)

PLAIN TWP.: Most schools start the day with the ringing of a bell, but, normally, it isn’t a Tibetan bell.

And it isn’t being used to signal a short, contemplative period before the bustle of the day.

That’s how Warstler Elementary School in Plain Township began a recent school day.

civmindful30cut_02

Taylor Swinhart, 9, rings a singing bowl as school principal Jody Ditcher watches as part of the morning school opening ceremony. The bowl is part of mindfulness program taught by counselor Joel McNenny to help students focus and relax at Warstler Elementary School. (Paul Tople/Akron Beacon Journal)

Taylor Swhihart, a fourth-grader, hit the bell and a hushed silence fell over the 330 students and teachers in the gymnasium where minutes before they had been dancing together to a Wii game projected onto a large screen.

Taylor hit the bell a second time. And a third. The students and teachers stood silent and still — doing nothing but breathing in and out.

“That’s enough,” Taylor told Principal Jody Ditcher, who held a microphone up to the bell.

“You guys feel better?” Ditcher whispered.

The students then filed out of the gymnasium, walking quietly through the hallways — a school rule — to their classrooms and getting on with the business of learning.

This is the morning routine [every morning] at Warstler where the school practices mindfulness, a form of [Eastern] meditation that involves using techniques like “belly breaths” and “mindful movements” to improve students’ focus and help them better cope with their emotions. The Stark County school district piloted mindfulness in Warstler last year [2011-2012 school year] and was so pleased with the results that it started the practice The district hopes to expand the method to every school by next year [2013-2014 school year]. [Plain Local is also publicizing their implementation of the "Common Core" standardization of public schools - another issue offensive to Christian parents.]

Plain is thought to be the only district or one of the few in the Akron-Canton area using mindfulness, though U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Niles, who recently wrote a book about the practice, has helped get it started in several schools in the Youngstown area. Other area districts are considering adopting the method, with the Canton City school district recently calling Joel McNenny, the counselor at Warstler, to ask about the practice.

McNenny, a counselor for 19 years, with nine of them at Warstler, calls mindfulness “transformative” and “revolutionary” and insists it can be a cure for what ails schools of all sizes — improving test scores, decreasing behavior problems and lessening problems like bullying. He says the practice is steeped in science — not religion — and provides students with a skill that will last a lifetime. [This is very deceptive. How can this practice not be steeped in religion, if occult Buddhist symbols and rituals are involved?]

“I’d like to spread the word,” said McNenny, who was inspired by Ryan’s book and other research he came across about the practice while working on his counseling doctorate. “It’s a simple program that can be taught and has very powerful affects.”

Mindful discovery

McNenny first saw mindfulness in action through the First Tee program, which teaches youths the game of golf.

McNenny, who is working on his clinical counseling degree and interned with a mindfulness therapist [I wonder if this "mindfulness therapist" graduated with a Spiritual Psychology degree from the New Age-ish University of Santa Monica, the alma mater of New Ager Roma Downey], said youths in the program were given a 10-minute lesson, which was then reinforced by instructors on the course. He was surprised by the results.

“The kids just took to it,” he said.

This got McNenny thinking about the possibility of teaching mindfulness at Warstler and other schools in the Plain district. What kind of results could this net, he wondered. He did some research to find out more about mindfulness.

Mindfulness is “a particular way of paying attention. It is the mental faculty of purposefully bringing awareness to one’s experience. Mindfulness can be applied to sensory experience, thoughts, and emotions by using sustained attention and noticing our experience without reacting,” according to the website for Mindful Schools, a nonprofit organization based in Oakland, Calif., that teaches the technique. [This info on mindfulness is very, very watered down, barely mentioning its strong New Age and Buddhist origins.]

Mindful Schools partnered with the University of California, Davis in the 2011-12 school year and found statistically significant improvements in behavior in students who had received four hours of mindfulness instruction versus students who had not, according to the Mindful Schools website.

The practice has gained champions over the years, most notably actress Goldie Hawn. [I oppose Catholicism, but I did find this helpful Catholic article exposing Goldie Hawn's involvement in promulgating mindfulness.] Others include NBA coach Phil Jackson, Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant and the U.S. Marine Corps.

McNenny came across Ryan’s book A Mindful Nation published in March, in the course of his research and was very excited to see a prominent Ohio politician writing about a process he was helping implement in his district.

“It helped me make it so it could be done,” he said. “It showed that it can be done in schools with a nonfaith-based method. I was encouraged by that.” [Again, how can mindfulness at Warstler be considered "nonfaith-based", when Warstler is using Buddhist symbols and rituals?]

McNenny went to a campaign event Ryan had before the November election and thanked him for his book. He’s invited Ryan to visit Warstler, a visit Ryan’s staff is hoping he can make early in the new year.

“We’d love to have him,” McNenny said. “We are not in his district but he is close by.”

Mindful methods

Warstler has a mindfulness room where McNenny meets with the students on a rotating basis.

The room has a lava lamp, blankets draped over the bulletin boards, a rug for the students to sit on, scrolls featuring quotes from the Dalai Lama {a Buddhist, not a non-faith leader] and hand painted inspirational messages like, “Simply become who you are.”

McNenny started a recent session by having the students sit cross legged on the rug, with the blinds closed, the lights dimmed and soothing, instrumental music playing [it's more than just instrumental music - it's New Age music]. He told them to sit up with their hands on their knees or their bellies and said they could close their eyes or look at the floor.

Jikaiya Holston, 7, one of the students, rang a bell slowly three times. The students sat quietly with downcast or closed eyes for three minutes. Some made circles with one hand on the other hand.

“OK, you OK?” McNenny asked the students.

He asked the students to explain mindfulness to the visiting journalists.

“If you get angry, you take a belly breath and calm down,” one boy said.

“When you take a test,” another student chimed in.

“Any time you’re stressed,” a third said.

“Memories don’t mess up your brain,” a fourth student explained.

McNenny said a belly breath involves putting a hand on your belly and taking a deep breath and feeling yourself inhale and exhale.

McNenny asked the students to stand for “mindful movements,” a series of exercises paired with breathing in and out. They raised and lowered their arms, rolled their hands to the sides of their heads and back out, put their hands on their waists and made circles with the upper parts of their bodies, crouched like frogs, and lifted one leg off the ground.

“Remember: mind on your movements,” McNenny instructed. “If your mind is on your movements, you should be able to balance.”

McNenny ended the 35-minute session by having the students lay on their backs with their hands on their bellies and close their eyes, concentrating on breathing. He turned the light off in the room and closed the door. Most of the students laid still, though a few squirmed or whispered to the student next to them.

“Mindfully stand up,” McNenny said. “If your friend is asleep next to you, wake him or her up.”

Besides the morning routine and McNenny’s sessions, teachers reinforce mindfulness in the classroom, using a chime when they think students need to pause and take a breath. They often use this tactic to help students focus before taking a test.

McNenny sometimes meets with students one-on-one or in small groups when they are having problems, like test anxiety or behavior issues.

Not all of his mindful experiments are successful right away. He recalled taking students outside one day to have them practice “mindful walking.” Half the students made a beeline for the playground. He then changed his approach, giving the students books to balance on their heads — an old trick for improving posture that helped get across the idea of focusing on walking.

Mindful results

McNenny and Ditcher think mindfulness has helped at Warstler and point to both quantitative and anecdotal evidence.

Ditcher, who has been Warstler’s principal for four years, credits mindfulness for helping to boost the school’s performance index …

“I believe it’s a conduit for our practices,” she said. “I can’t imagine running a school without it.” [Ditcher goes on to describe various increases in student performance, which she attributes largely to mindfulness.]…

Some Warstler parents initially had questions about mindfulness, with a few concerned that it was meshing religion and education. [Actually, born again Christian parents would not mind Christianity being meshed with education, but they would abhor occult Buddhist mindfulness being meshed with education. Especially in light of the fact that Christian teachings are forbidden in public schools.] Ditcher said she explained that meditation is a component in many faiths, but that they aren’t teaching mindfulness in “any religious way.” She said a student recently told her that some youths at his church were anxious before a performance and he told them, “Here’s what we do in my school,” and showed them how to belly breathe.He said the exercise helped calm their nerves before taking the stage.

Stephanie Warsmith can be reached at 330-996-3705 or swarsmith@thebeaconjournal.com. Follow on Twitter: @swarsmith. Read the Beacon Journal’s political blog at www.ohio.com/blogs/ohio-politics.

FOR FURTHER READING

Christian discernment articles rightly condemning mindfulness

CANA’s complete list of  articles on mindfulness
Berit Kjos’ complete list of articles on mindfulness

BEWARE – The first guide for children (ages 3 to 10) to centering prayer – Centering prayer overlaps with mindfulness; it also comes from Eastern religions (specifically Buddhism).

Articles favoring mindfulness

A HUGE list of Google hits on the search string ["mindfulness" "children"] – I have found very few Christian articles exposing the indoctrination of children into occult Buddhist mindfulness. I suppose this should come as no surprise, considering that most born again evangelical denominations are becoming involved in contemplative spirituality ala Richard Foster’s Spiritual Formation. And Spiritual Formation is largely based on Buddhist, Hindu and other Eastern meditative practices. Tragic!

Amazon list of 442 resources for teaching mindfulness to children

What Is Spiritual Psychology? – This article by Kate Nesbitt gives a New Age definition of Spiritual Psychology (which includes mindfulness).  Note that 1) the writer graduated from the same school as “Touched by an Angel’s” New Age starlet Roma Downey. And 2) Downey has stated elsewhere,  since she graduated with her Spiritual Psychology degree, that she hopes to become a “therapist” (similar to Kate Nesbitt, I assume). I believe Downey could eventually incorporate mindfulness into her New Age therapeutic practices, becoming basically a “poster child” for mindfulness. She is already the driving force behind various children’s publications, including the occultish Little Angels series.

Online books favoring mindfulness – general referance books

Jon Kabat-Zinn, Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation In Everyday Life (2009)

Articles favoring mindfulness in education

SEL and mindfulness

Mindfulness for teachers and students in NYC: Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) in Schools

Online books favoring mindfulness – in education

Deborah Schoeberlein and Suki Sheth, Mindful Teaching and Teaching Mindfulness: A Guide for Anyone Who Teaches Anything (2011)

Online books found using Google search string ["mindfulness" "education"]

Goldie Hawn, Jim Ryan and others have also written books about mindfulness in education.

Online videos favoring mindfulness practiced by children

YouTube list of videos re: mindfulness  practiced by children

Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn’s Benefit for Mindful Schools: The Role of Mindfulness in Education

Articles mostly favoring Congressman Jim Ryan and mindfulness

Jim Axelrod, Ohio congressman’s meditation crusade (02/19/13)

Google list of hits on search string ["Jim Ryan" "mindfulness"]

Articles mostly favoring Goldie Hawn and mindfulness

Google list of hits on search string ["Goldie Hawn" "mindfulness"]

So-called “Christian” resources endorsing mindfulness

Phil Monroe, Christian Psychology and Mindfulness

Christian Book Distributor (CBD) list of eleven so-called “Christian” mindfulness books. They are anything but Christian – and CBD long ago ceased to be a born again, biblically sound Christian book company.

Google list of hits on search string ["Christian" "mindfulness"] – most of these hits consist of so-called “Christian” articles favoring mindfulness. What an abomination – the so-called Christian writers favoring mindfulness have departed from the Christian faith, entering apostasy.

Ohio educator articles mentioning mindfulness (note – they do not mention the occult New Age-ish Buddhist origins of mindfulness)

Dr. Ralph Johnson, Opening Day Speech 2003

Dr. Charles Q. Gage, “The Meaning and Measure of School Mindfulness: An Exploratory Analysis” (2003)

Addendum: my comment to Amy and Mike of “Stand Up for the Truth!” 03/23/13, posted here:

Amy and Mike, I’m writing a blog on mindfulness in public schools. It’s a work in progress: http://davemosher.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/occult-buddhist-mindfulness-being-adopted-by-all-plain-local-district-schools-near-canton-ohio/ The actual title now is: “Occult New Age-ish Buddhist “mindfulness” invading preschools and public grade schools nationwide”.

This ties in with my blog about Roma Downey’s degree in Spiritual Psychology. I’m guessing many if not most “mindfulness therapists” graduated from the same school as Downey – the New Age-ish University of Santa Monica – with a degree in Spiritual Psychology.

I’m amazed how few Christian discernment articles there are exposing mindfulness in preschools and grade schools. This, as opposed to the huge number of articles and books favoring this and instructing teachers how to teach it.

Looks like we have our work cut out for us. I’m hoping to write a series of articles about mindfulness in preschools and public grade schools, similar to the format I used with my Roma Downey blogs.

God bless you – Dave

Click below for the various parts of this series on New Ager Roma Downey (and husband Mark Burnett):

Like Oprah, New Agers Roma Downey and hubby Mark Burnett now falsely claiming they’re Christians – why?

Roma Downey’s comments about “Touched by an Angel” show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

Roma Downey’s comments about her ties with New Thought/New Ager Della Reese  show Downey is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

Roma Downey’s comments about her “Little Angels” series show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

Roma Downey’s comments about her New Age “Spiritual Psychology” degree show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

NEW: Roma Downey’s comments and connections with psychic medium John Edward show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

Roma Downey’s comments about her theology show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

Roma Downey’s comments about her “biographical trivia” show she is not a Christian as she claims, but a New Ager

NEW: New blogs I’m working on, showing in Downey and Burnett’s own words that they are not Christians as they claim, but New Agers

———————————————————————————————–

Now on to the current blog:

(revised 03/21/13)

New blogs I’m working on, showing in Downey and Burnett’s own words that they are not Christians as they claim, but New Agers

I’m finding more documentation that Downey (and hubby Mark Burnett) are not born again Christians as they claim, but today are still New Agers. I’m hoping to incorporate this newly found documentation into new blogs. I will list these proposed blogs below, but first, some comments:

Some viewers of “The Bible” may think Downey has changed – that she was New Age but is now a born again Christian. NOT! For one, Downy and her hubby are both claiming that Downey has been a “person of faith” all her life. Yet, even today there is no mention of a conversion experience in Downey’s life.

Up until Downey’s 2010 graduation from the University of Santa Monica (with a degree in New Age “Spiritual Psychology”), one could find many references to Downey being New Age. Actually,  her so-called “Christian faith”/spiritual journey seems to be an occult New Age smorgasboard of Roman Catholicism, Celtic “Christianity”, Della Reese (New Thought), John Edward (Rosary-praying psychic medium), John-Rogers (New Age), Eckhard Tolle (New Age), etc. Not to mention a New Age obsession with “angels” (who in “Touched by an Angel” never mention our Lord Jesus Christ) and “miracles” (in the “It’s a Miracle” TV series these mostly consist of occult manifestations).

On top of all this, in recent years Downey (and her hubby) seem to have adopted theological bits and pieces from Joel Osteen (evangelical prosperity gospel, positive thinking), Rick Warren (evangelical seeker sensitive, global P.E.A.C.E. Plan), T.D. Jakes (evangelical prosperity gospel, hints of Jesus-Only/Oneness Pentecostalism), etc.

So where does Downey stand today? I do not believe she is a born again Christian as she has claimed recently. (In  various interviews, she’s maintained that she’s known Jesus all her life, that she’s born again, and that she’s accepted Jesus as her Saviour.) Yet nowhere have I heard Downey mentioning a conversion to true Christianity – repenting of 53 years of an ungodly New Age mishmash, being born again, accepting Christ as her Saviour so she won’t spend eternity in Hell/the Lake of Fire.

Now on to the new blogs I’m working on for this series:

New Blog #1) Why are New Agers endorsing “The Bible” miniseries? – Many New Agers love “The Bible”. Examples: 1) psychic medium John Edward (a good friend of Downey’s) tweeted his endorsement of the miniseries, 2) this New Age blogger recommends the miniseries, 3) various articles refer to Oprah Winfrey (who is New Age) tweeting her enthusiastic endorsement of  “The Bible”.

I was puzzled at first – why did Roma Downey feel so compelled to produce “The Bible” miniseries, having received a New Age Spiritual Psychology degree? Why is someone so into New Age teachings so obsessed with sharing the Bible? It just doesn’t make sense. Unless perhaps she wants to share New Age themes she sees in the Bible. (After all, there are many unbiblical points in the miniseries.) Two obviously New Age themes are an overemphasis on angels (reminiscent of “Touched by an Angel”), and an overemphasis on miracles (reminiscent of Downey’s hosting some  “It’s a Miracle” episodes – and perhaps with hints of “A Course in Miracles”).

I believe the key can be found in how New Agers interpret the Bible.  Check out this Christian discernment article  – an introduction to New Age interpretations of the Bible. Perhaps a study of John-Roger (born Roger Delano Hinkins) and his New Age interpretations of the Bible will show more subtle New Age themes in “The Bible” miniseries. (Downey graduated from John-Roger’s New Age school). For more information on John-Rogers and his movement, see this Christian article . Also, see my blog on Downey’s New Age Spiritual Psychology degree here.

Even if “The Bible” was not produced with an exclusively New Age agenda, it was definitely produced with an ecumenical, interfaith bias. It is a watered down Bible, reducing Christ in many places to merely a great man – not the God-Man, the Son of God, the second Person of the Trinity, our Saviour. “The Bible” pleases everyone (except born again Christians) and offends no one (except born again Christians).

New Blog #2) In “The Bible” miniseries itself – the portrayal of angels: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1YhLpDv7PE Clips like this remind me of Downey’s New Ageish “Touched by an Angel” TV series. (It has always shocked me that the angels in “Touched by an Angel” never mention Jesus.)

Again, in “The Bible” miniseries itself: Downey and Burnett’s claims of three miracles while filming – see http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/11/3-real-life-miracles-that-took-place-on-the-set-of-the-bible/ The original article (with different photos) can be found here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2291441/The-Bible-Blockbusters-producer-claims-miracles-took-place-set.html I believe these are just as likely three counterfeit miracles from the Enemy of our souls, making these ungodly people think the miracles are from God. How can there be miracles from God on set, when the producers are New Age and the actors are nonchristians? In Jesus’ ministry, one of the purposes of miracles was to verify His authenticity; Downey and Burnett’s “ministry” is not authentically Christian.

Remember when Downey hosted various episodes of “It’s a Miracle” (see proposed blog below)? Downey seems to call every supernatural phenomena a “miracle” – whether it is from God or from Satan and his minions.

New Blog #3) Their 100-day devotional book based on “The Bible”. Many days have New Ageish lingo if read very closely. Here is the Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/Story-God-All-Reflections-Inspirations/dp/1455525677/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1363010459&sr=8-1&keywords=the+bible+reflections+downey

New Blog #4) “Christian” Roma Downey hosting demonic “Touched by an Angel” marathon on GMC … on Easter Sunday 2013. (When the listing becomes available, I plan to list the episodes of TBAA being shown.) If she were truly born again, Downey would certainly have wisdom, common sense,  and biblical discernment. She would realize how irreverent/blasphemous it is to host TBAA on – of all days – a Christian “holy day”. (I oppose Catholicism – I’m trying to come up with a term more appropriate than “holy day”.) Want proof that TBAA has a demonic theme in its 212 episodes? As mentioned above, throughout  the series, the “angels” never mention the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. This is a trait of demonic angels, not heavenly angels. Yet even today Downey continues to praise the TBAA episodes, maintaining she and the other “angels” did a wonderful thing by bringing viewers God’s word (small w, I say).

In a commercial on GMC March 13 and other days in March 2013, Downey says, “Hello, this is Roma Downey encouraging you to gather your family for a very special “Touched by an Angel” marathon [clip inserted of "angel"/New Thought minister Della Reese saying "and that oughtta be good"] – a full day featuring some of my fondest show memories and a collection of episodes that will remind us all what Easter is really about” [clip inserted of "angel" Della Reese saying "miracles happen around you every day", then guest star Valerie Bertinelli responds "Amen"]. Join me for Miracle Sunday.” GMC then makes an announcement: “All day this Easter, leading up to the GMC World Premiere Movie, “The Carpenter’s Miracle” [another occult/New Age show] at 7.” Downey then closes the commercial, quoting GMC’s motto, “Uplifting Entertainment”.

First of all, does “born again” Christian Roma Downey really believe TBAA – which never mentions our Lord Jesus Christ – reminds of us of what Resurrection Day is really about? (Unless of course Downey is not a born again Christian, but actually a New Ager.) And second, GMC started out as “Gospel Music Channel” – why are they now showing the “non-heavenly angel”/”occultish miracle” genre of TV shows?

New Blog #5) Roma Downey’s comments on hosting various episodes of  “It’s a Miracle” from 2003-2004.  Click here for details on this TV series. And click here for a list of the episodes; I’m trying to determine which of the 267 episodes Downey hosted. Born again Christians viewing this TV series believe most of the “miracles” were not from God but were demonic, occult manifestations (ESP, psychic mediums, past life experiences, astral travel, etc.).

New Blog #6) Roma Downey’s comments about her music (which is New Age). Click here for her discography.

I am currently in the process of adding more info to this blog – keep  checking back. And thank you for your patience. New info on Roma Downey and hubby Mark Burnett is coming out almost daily – it’s hard to keep up with!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers

%d bloggers like this: